Embargo/Entity Search/STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE OF THE CITY OF SEVASTOPOL 'SEVASTOPOL SEA PORT'

STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE OF THE CITY OF SEVASTOPOL 'SEVASTOPOL SEA PORT'

Q: Is STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE OF THE CITY OF SEVASTOPOL 'SEVASTOPOL SEA PORT' sanctioned?

Yes, STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE OF THE CITY OF SEVASTOPOL 'SEVASTOPOL SEA PORT' appears on 7 restricted-party lists across 7 jurisdictions. Risk score: 100/100.

Q: What sanctions lists is STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE OF THE CITY OF SEVASTOPOL 'SEVASTOPOL SEA PORT' on?

OFAC SDN List, BIS Entity List, EU Financial Sanctions, UK Financial Sanctions, Canada SEMA Sanctions, Australia DFAT Sanctions, Swiss SECO Sanctions

Ukraine

Port of SevastopolSeaport of SevastopolSevastopol Commercial SeaportSevastopol Merchant Sea PortSevastopol Sea PortSevastopol Sea Trade Port+34 more

100HIGH RISK

7 Appearances7 Jurisdictions

✓Confirmed — Listed on OFAC SDN List · BIS Entity List · EU Financial Sanctions · +4 more

Corporate Structure

1 corporate parent identified — sign up to view the full ownership chain and affiliates.

Sanction History

US BIS3 Jul 2026

Screening list update — 89 entities added (BIS Entity List, UK Financial Sanctions, OFAC SDN List, EU Financial Sanctions, Swiss SECO Sanctions, Canada SEMA Sanctions, Denied Persons List, Australia DFAT Sanctions, Non-SDN MBS List, Sectoral Sanctions (SSI), UN Consolidated Sanctions), 5802 removed

UK OFSI3 Jul 2026

Screening list update — 518 entities added (OFAC SDN List, UK Financial Sanctions, Swiss SECO Sanctions, Australia DFAT Sanctions, EU Financial Sanctions, UN Consolidated Sanctions, BIS Entity List, Canada SEMA Sanctions, Sectoral Sanctions (SSI), Nonproliferation Sanctions, PLC List, Non-SDN MBS List, UFLPA Entity List), 5802 removed

HIGH RISK

Risk Assessment

This entity carries a high-risk classification based on 7 sanctions list appearances across 7 jurisdictions. Cross-jurisdictional exposure across 7 separate regulatory authorities significantly elevates compliance burden. Listed for over 11 years, indicating persistent regulatory concern. No ECCN technology tags on record — technology-specific licence triggers may not apply, but end-user restrictions still stand. Country of concern: Ukraine. Proceed with extreme caution — legal counsel is recommended before any transaction.

7 list appearances7 jurisdictionsFirst listed 2014

What These Restrictions Mean

Full block (asset freeze)OFAC SDN List

All property and interests in property are blocked and US persons are prohibited from virtually all dealings. The 50% rule extends this to entities majority-owned by the SDN.

Licence — presumption of denialBIS Entity List

A BIS licence is required for EAR-controlled items, typically reviewed under a presumption of denial.

What These Lists Mean

BIS Entity List1 entry

US Bureau of Industry and Security list of parties subject to heightened export scrutiny.

Compliance implication: A licence from BIS is required before exporting, re-exporting, or transferring any EAR-controlled item to this entity.

UK OFSI1 entry

HM Treasury Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation — UK consolidated list of financial sanctions targets.

Compliance implication: UK persons must freeze all funds and economic resources of listed parties and are prohibited from dealing with them without an OFSI licence.