About Embargo
Compliance work should leave a reviewable evidence trail.
Restricted-party checks often begin with fragmented government files and end in screenshots, spreadsheets, and decisions that are difficult to reconstruct.
Pintu Holdings Ltd builds Embargo to give lean trade-compliance teams a self-service path from identity screening to ongoing monitoring and point-in-time evidence—while keeping the limits of the data visible.
The service
One working path from a name to evidence.
Embargo is designed around the human review task, not around a promise that software can determine every party or transaction automatically.
- 01
Screen identities against supported registry sources
Review candidate records, list memberships, names, identifiers, source links, and available relationship evidence without presenting a database result as a legal verdict.
- 02
Keep a defined counterparty set under review
Save the names that matter to your process. Embargo re-screens them after registry updates and records incomplete checks rather than silently converting missing evidence into a reassuring status.
- 03
Preserve what the reviewer saw
Screening records, source context, exports, and eligible certificates create a point-in-time evidence trail for later review. They do not replace transaction analysis or legal advice.
Automation accountability
AI can assist the analysis. It cannot become the authority.
Regulatory facts and list memberships come from source records. Automated analysis is a separate, reviewable layer and is never a substitute for the underlying authority evidence.
Source facts first
Names, list memberships, dates, and regulatory links remain traceable to source records. Generated prose does not create a designation or change registry membership.
Evidence-bound generation
Generated notes must cite stored evidence for their displayed claims. Outputs that fail grounding or provenance checks are rejected.
Approval before visibility
Customer-facing notes and regulatory summaries pass defined review and integrity checks. Notes that are stale, unapproved, or inconsistent with their evidence remain hidden.
Decision support, not a verdict
Embargo surfaces evidence and preserves the review path. The customer remains responsible for identity resolution, legal scope, transaction facts, and the final decision.
Operating principle
Earn trust through inspectable evidence, qualified language, and visible limits.
That means publishing supported coverage and feed status, distinguishing candidates from confirmed identities, and correcting the product when its evidence cannot support a stronger claim.
Company record
- Legal name
- Pintu Holdings Ltd
- Trading as
- Embargo
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
Inspect the product before accepting the promise.
Public screening is available without an account, or bring a representative case to a guided demo.