Identity data varies by authority
Names, aliases, addresses, registration numbers, dates, and historical depth are not uniformly available. A name search is a review input, not proof of identity.
Coverage & methodology
Embargo supports sources across 10 regulatory jurisdictions and blocs, but not every source performs the same job. Inspect what feeds screening, what feeds regulatory-change monitoring, how evidence is processed, and where the boundaries remain.
Counts describe configured source coverage, not live source health or universal data completeness. Priority alert feeds are scheduled to be polled every four hours; that cadence is not a source-publication or delivery SLA.
Capability map
Screening registry means a configured source contributes party records to the published registry. Change monitoring means a configured external feed contributes regulatory notices or change signals. “Not configured” is explicit; it is not converted into a negative finding.
| Jurisdiction or bloc | Screening registry | Change monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| United States | United States screening registry: Supported | United States change monitoring: Supported |
| European Union | European Union screening registry: Supported | European Union change monitoring: Supported |
| United Kingdom | United Kingdom screening registry: Supported | United Kingdom change monitoring: Supported |
| Japan | Japan screening registry: Not configured | Japan change monitoring: Supported |
| Netherlands | Netherlands screening registry: Not configured | Netherlands change monitoring: Supported |
| Germany | Germany screening registry: Not configured | Germany change monitoring: Supported |
| United Nations | United Nations screening registry: Supported | United Nations change monitoring: Not configured |
| Canada | Canada screening registry: Supported | Canada change monitoring: Supported |
| Australia | Australia screening registry: Supported | Australia change monitoring: Supported |
| Switzerland | Switzerland screening registry: Supported | Switzerland change monitoring: Supported |
Registry inputs
These source families feed the registry publication workflow. Consolidated sources can contain several individual regulatory lists.
Browse the regulatory list catalogue →US
Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.
3 connected change signals
EU
Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.
1 connected change signal
UK
Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.
1 connected change signal
UN
Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.
Registry source; no separate alert feed mapped
Canada
Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.
1 connected change signal
Australia
Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.
1 connected change signal
Switzerland
Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.
1 connected change signal
US
Maintained as a controlled manual fixture because automated source access is unavailable.
Registry source; no separate alert feed mapped
US
Maintained as a controlled manual fixture because automated source access is unavailable.
Registry source; no separate alert feed mapped
Evidence method
Each layer has a different evidentiary role. Derived analysis can explain stored facts, but it cannot silently rewrite an authority record or manufacture missing identity evidence.
Collect a supported government list, notice, or publication while retaining its source identity and available publication evidence.
Normalize names and identifiers without silently merging two parties that have conflicting non-null countries.
Validate and publish a versioned registry artifact with integrity evidence before it becomes the screening baseline.
Compare the submitted identity with available records, expose candidates and uncertainty, and keep incomplete checks out of no-match outcomes.
Keep authority facts, relationship evidence, reviewed analysis, and the customer decision distinguishable in the resulting record.
Boundaries
Names, aliases, addresses, registration numbers, dates, and historical depth are not uniformly available. A name search is a review input, not proof of identity.
Displayed relationships are limited to sourced, reviewable evidence. Missing ownership evidence is not represented as proof that no relevant ownership exists.
A regulatory-change feed can support alerts without adding a screening list. A registry source can support screening without a separate change-alert feed.
Embargo does not determine transaction legality, licence requirements, item classification, end use, or every ownership-based restriction from a direct name check.
Report a suspected data issue or ask about a source contract. Corrections are investigated against stored and primary-source evidence.
Contact Embargo →Operational assurance
The live status page evaluates every configured feed and internal pipeline against its recorded run receipt and configured threshold.