Coverage & methodology

Know which evidence supports each screening outcome.

Embargo supports sources across 10 regulatory jurisdictions and blocs, but not every source performs the same job. Inspect what feeds screening, what feeds regulatory-change monitoring, how evidence is processed, and where the boundaries remain.

Supported jurisdictions and blocs
10
Configured registry source families
9
Catalogued regulatory list families
17

Counts describe configured source coverage, not live source health or universal data completeness. Priority alert feeds are scheduled to be polled every four hours; that cadence is not a source-publication or delivery SLA.

Capability map

Coverage depends on the product function.

Screening registry means a configured source contributes party records to the published registry. Change monitoring means a configured external feed contributes regulatory notices or change signals. “Not configured” is explicit; it is not converted into a negative finding.

Jurisdiction or blocScreening registryChange monitoring
United StatesUnited States screening registry: SupportedUnited States change monitoring: Supported
European UnionEuropean Union screening registry: SupportedEuropean Union change monitoring: Supported
United KingdomUnited Kingdom screening registry: SupportedUnited Kingdom change monitoring: Supported
JapanJapan screening registry: Not configuredJapan change monitoring: Supported
NetherlandsNetherlands screening registry: Not configuredNetherlands change monitoring: Supported
GermanyGermany screening registry: Not configuredGermany change monitoring: Supported
United NationsUnited Nations screening registry: SupportedUnited Nations change monitoring: Not configured
CanadaCanada screening registry: SupportedCanada change monitoring: Supported
AustraliaAustralia screening registry: SupportedAustralia change monitoring: Supported
SwitzerlandSwitzerland screening registry: SupportedSwitzerland change monitoring: Supported

Registry inputs

Configured screening sources

These source families feed the registry publication workflow. Consolidated sources can contain several individual regulatory lists.

Browse the regulatory list catalogue →

US

US Consolidated Screening List (BIS / OFAC / State)

Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.

3 connected change signals

EU

EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List

Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.

1 connected change signal

UK

UK OFSI Consolidated List (HM Treasury)

Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.

1 connected change signal

UN

UN Security Council Consolidated List

Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.

Registry source; no separate alert feed mapped

Canada

Canada Consolidated Autonomous Sanctions (SEMA)

Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.

1 connected change signal

Australia

Australian Sanctions Consolidated List (DFAT)

Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.

1 connected change signal

Switzerland

Swiss Overall Sanctions List (SECO)

Included in the scheduled daily registry publication workflow.

1 connected change signal

US

US DoD §1260H Chinese Military Companies

Maintained as a controlled manual fixture because automated source access is unavailable.

Registry source; no separate alert feed mapped

US

US DHS UFLPA Entity List

Maintained as a controlled manual fixture because automated source access is unavailable.

Registry source; no separate alert feed mapped

Evidence method

From authority publication to reviewable record.

Each layer has a different evidentiary role. Derived analysis can explain stored facts, but it cannot silently rewrite an authority record or manufacture missing identity evidence.

  1. 01

    Authority record

    Collect a supported government list, notice, or publication while retaining its source identity and available publication evidence.

  2. 02

    Normalized identity

    Normalize names and identifiers without silently merging two parties that have conflicting non-null countries.

  3. 03

    Registry publication

    Validate and publish a versioned registry artifact with integrity evidence before it becomes the screening baseline.

  4. 04

    Match and review

    Compare the submitted identity with available records, expose candidates and uncertainty, and keep incomplete checks out of no-match outcomes.

  5. 05

    Decision evidence

    Keep authority facts, relationship evidence, reviewed analysis, and the customer decision distinguishable in the resulting record.

Boundaries

What the coverage does not establish.

Identity data varies by authority

Names, aliases, addresses, registration numbers, dates, and historical depth are not uniformly available. A name search is a review input, not proof of identity.

Ownership is evidence-bounded

Displayed relationships are limited to sourced, reviewable evidence. Missing ownership evidence is not represented as proof that no relevant ownership exists.

Change monitoring and registry coverage differ

A regulatory-change feed can support alerts without adding a screening list. A registry source can support screening without a separate change-alert feed.

Coverage is not legal clearance

Embargo does not determine transaction legality, licence requirements, item classification, end use, or every ownership-based restriction from a direct name check.

Report a suspected data issue or ask about a source contract. Corrections are investigated against stored and primary-source evidence.

Contact Embargo →

Operational assurance

Inspect the latest recorded source and pipeline runs.

The live status page evaluates every configured feed and internal pipeline against its recorded run receipt and configured threshold.

View live status