Restricted-party evidence record
Cham Wings Airlines
Syria
Quick Answers
- Is Cham Wings Airlines sanctioned?
- Yes, Cham Wings Airlines appears on 4 restricted-party lists across 4 jurisdictions. Risk score: 100/100.
- What sanctions lists is Cham Wings Airlines on?
- Swiss SECO Sanctions, BIS Entity List, OFAC SDN List, EU Financial Sanctions
- When was Cham Wings Airlines first listed?
- Cham Wings Airlines was first listed on 15 August 2011.
- What country is Cham Wings Airlines associated with?
- Cham Wings Airlines is associated with Syria.
How to use this record
This page assembles registry identity and authority evidence for review. It does not establish that your counterparty is the same party, decide whether a restriction applies to a transaction, or replace the latest issuing-authority publication.
Authority Record History
1 more entry across 4 jurisdictions
Sign in to view the full sanction timeline. Watch this entity for alerts when its status changes.
Permanent free plan available · paid trials require a card
Evidence Summary
Embargo's active registry records 4 current list appearances across 4 jurisdictions for this record. The model indicator summarizes this registry context; it does not establish identity, legal scope, or a transaction outcome. Review each current membership and the latest issuing-authority publication before reliance.
What These Restrictions Mean
Consult the applicable Swiss ordinance and SECO entry for the exact financial and trade restrictions.
A BIS licence is required for items subject to the EAR. Review policy and item scope vary by entry and must be verified against the official Entity List.
Property and interests in property are blocked where US jurisdiction applies. OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule may extend blocking to owned entities.
Consult the cited EU legal act for the applicable asset freeze, funds prohibition, travel restriction, or other measure.
What These Lists Mean
Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs sanctions list, implementing autonomous and UN-mandated measures.
Compliance implication: Swiss persons must freeze assets of listed parties and require SECO authorisation before making funds or economic resources available.
US Bureau of Industry and Security regulatory evidence. BIS maintains several lists with materially different legal effects.
Compliance implication: Consult the exact BIS list and underlying order or entry; jurisdiction alone does not establish a licence policy or prohibition.
US Treasury sanctions list covering SDNs, sectoral sanctions, and country-based programs.
Compliance implication: US persons must block assets and are prohibited from dealing with listed parties.
EU consolidated sanctions list published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Compliance implication: EU operators must freeze all funds and economic resources belonging to listed parties.
Listed By
Details
Export Control Profile
Swiss sanctions. Consult the applicable Swiss ordinance and SECO entry for the exact financial and trade restrictions.
Licence requirement. A BIS licence is required for items subject to the EAR. Review policy and item scope vary by entry and must be verified against the official Entity List.
Blocking sanctions. Property and interests in property are blocked where US jurisdiction applies. OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule may extend blocking to owned entities.
EU restrictive measures. Consult the cited EU legal act for the applicable asset freeze, funds prohibition, travel restriction, or other measure.
Known Addresses
Full Intelligence
See related regulatory alerts, intelligence feed, and export a compliance report.
Related Registry Records
Other records appearing in Switzerland / US BIS source families. Similarity is review context, not an identity match.
Salim Ahmad Salim Hamdan
100Muhammad Taher Anwari
100Ibrahim Ali Abu Bakr Tantoush
100Nazirullah Hanafi Waliullah
100Aminullah Amin Quddus
100Mohammad Abbas Akhund
100Screen another counterparty
← Back to entity search