Restricted-party evidence record
State enterprise "Kerch commercial sea port"
Ukraine
Quick Answers
- Is State enterprise "Kerch commercial sea port" sanctioned?
- Yes, State enterprise "Kerch commercial sea port" appears on 4 restricted-party lists across 4 jurisdictions. Risk score: 100/100.
- What sanctions lists is State enterprise "Kerch commercial sea port" on?
- BIS Entity List, OFAC SDN List, Swiss SECO Sanctions, Canada SEMA Sanctions
- When was State enterprise "Kerch commercial sea port" first listed?
- State enterprise "Kerch commercial sea port" was first listed on 6 August 2014.
- What country is State enterprise "Kerch commercial sea port" associated with?
- State enterprise "Kerch commercial sea port" is associated with Ukraine.
How to use this record
This page assembles registry identity and authority evidence for review. It does not establish that your counterparty is the same party, decide whether a restriction applies to a transaction, or replace the latest issuing-authority publication.
Authority Record History
1 more entry across 4 jurisdictions
Sign in to view the full sanction timeline. Watch this entity for alerts when its status changes.
Permanent free plan available · paid trials require a card
Evidence Summary
Embargo's active registry records 4 current list appearances across 4 jurisdictions for this record. The model indicator summarizes this registry context; it does not establish identity, legal scope, or a transaction outcome. Review each current membership and the latest issuing-authority publication before reliance.
What These Restrictions Mean
A BIS licence is required for items subject to the EAR. Review policy and item scope vary by entry and must be verified against the official Entity List.
Property and interests in property are blocked where US jurisdiction applies. OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule may extend blocking to owned entities.
Consult the applicable Swiss ordinance and SECO entry for the exact financial and trade restrictions.
Consult the applicable SEMA regulation and official consolidated listing for the exact dealings prohibitions.
What These Lists Mean
US Bureau of Industry and Security regulatory evidence. BIS maintains several lists with materially different legal effects.
Compliance implication: Consult the exact BIS list and underlying order or entry; jurisdiction alone does not establish a licence policy or prohibition.
US Treasury sanctions list covering SDNs, sectoral sanctions, and country-based programs.
Compliance implication: US persons must block assets and are prohibited from dealing with listed parties.
Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs sanctions list, implementing autonomous and UN-mandated measures.
Compliance implication: Swiss persons must freeze assets of listed parties and require SECO authorisation before making funds or economic resources available.
Canada Special Economic Measures Act autonomous sanctions list, administered by Global Affairs Canada.
Compliance implication: Canadian persons are prohibited from dealing in property of listed parties and must freeze all related assets.
Listed By
Details
Export Control Profile
Licence requirement. A BIS licence is required for items subject to the EAR. Review policy and item scope vary by entry and must be verified against the official Entity List.
Blocking sanctions. Property and interests in property are blocked where US jurisdiction applies. OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule may extend blocking to owned entities.
Swiss sanctions. Consult the applicable Swiss ordinance and SECO entry for the exact financial and trade restrictions.
Canadian sanctions. Consult the applicable SEMA regulation and official consolidated listing for the exact dealings prohibitions.
Known Addresses
Full Intelligence
See related regulatory alerts, intelligence feed, and export a compliance report.
Related Registry Records
Other records appearing in US BIS / US OFAC source families. Similarity is review context, not an identity match.
Screen another counterparty
← Back to entity search